... ve got through a question that I considered to ... BRing and I come across question14. "Oh man...this ... This is a strengthening question and A is definitely ... argument. But, since this question took me longer than ... your reasoning for that question if you are doing ...
... example: PT 27 Section 4 Question14. What I recommend bringing into ... this question is this basic framework: question is one of the **_foundations_ ...
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
... , you should be skipping that question without entering the AC. question 14, 15, 16, or 17 less ... to be an easy question than last question in a section or ... , maybe also getting the acceptability question, you could easily get a ...
**Highlighted question numbers that carry over** question numbers get highlighted and ... the question number to be highlighted. So, question14. itself ... could bee highlighted. When I go on to question ...
> @thisissparta said:
> Your numbering might be off. Question14 appears to be an Argument Part question. Is that the one that you're referring to?
> Hey. Sorry about that I meant to put PT 27.5 S1.Q14
... @lsat_muse said:
> **Question 13:**
> The reason ... the scenario in the question stem show that initially ... br />
>
> **Question14:**
> Oh man, I ...
>
> **Question 22:**
> The author ...
What question type(s) are you trying ... worth the time on other question types. For diagramming parallel q ... - I'm going to use question14 from PT 6 section 3 ...