Political scientist: Support The dissemination of political theories is in principle able to cause change in existing social structures. ββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ
The political scientist concludes that there is a special role for non-academics to put political theory into clear, accessible language. Why? Because although the spread of political theory can lead to social change, political theories always develop within academia. This leads to inaccessible language that alienates non-academics who would contribute to social changes.
The political scientist assumes itβs important for political theory to truly be able to lead to change, rather than just theoretically having that potential. Otherwise, it would be hard to say that people who would facilitate the change process have a βspecial role.β
The political scientist also assumes that political theory can only be put into clear, accessible language by non-academics. Otherwise it wouldnβt make sense to say that non-academics have that βspecial role.β
Which one of the following ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββ
Persons outside academic ββββββββ βββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββββ
Persons within academic ββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ
Persons outside academic ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββββ
Persons outside academic ββββββββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ
Persons within academic ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββ β βββββββββββββββ ββββ