PT103.S3.Q10 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The argument concludes that it’s safe to assume that either underinflating or overinflating tires damages the tires. Why? Because no one has proven that underinflation or overinflation don’t damage tires.

This is a “lack of support vs. false conclusion” flaw, where a position is taken to be false just because no one has proved that it’s true. Specifically, the argument rejects the possibility that underinflation and overinflation are harmless, just because that possibility hasn’t been proven.

The argument does not assume that underinflation and overinflation damage tires. There is support offered, even if that support is weak.

There isn’t anything in the argument that’s “not susceptible to proof”. No one is claiming that it’s impossible to prove whether underinflation and overinflation are harmless to tires, just that it hasn’t been proven yet.

The mechanism of how tire tread might be harmed isn’t relevant to the question of whether it’s safe to assume that the tire tread will be harmed, just because no one has proven that it won’t be harmed.

The argument rejects the possibility that it might be true that underinflation and overinflation don’t damage tires, even though it hasn’t been proven. This possibility undermines the idea that it’s “safe to assume” that the tires will be damaged.

The exact definition of what counts as an underinflated or overinflated tire is irrelevant to whether or not those conditions are likely to damage tires, based on the fact that they haven’t been proven not to damage tires.

PrepTest 103 - Section 3 - Question 10

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action