Between June 1987 and May 1988, the bodies of at least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the Atlantic coast of the United States. █████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ █████ ██████ ███████ ███ ███████ ████████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████ ███
Phenomenon ·Almost a thousand dolphins washed ashore dead
Presumably many more died and didn't wash ashore. What caused this?
Unusual bloom of P. brevis resulted in toxin accumulation in fish which was then eaten by dolphin. Dolphins then metabolized blubber which reduced their buoyancy and insulation and released synthetic pollutants (PCBs). This provided opportunity for bacterial infection which ultimately caused death.
Critique ·No die-off in Gulf of Mexico; timing and location mismatch; brevetoxin effects unknown
Red tides are common in Gulf of Mexico but no dolphin die-off there; dolphins began dying in the north in June yet red tide bloomed in the south in October; effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown.
Alternative Hypothesis ·Exposure to synthetic pollutants
Sudden influx of pollutants triggered a cascade of problems in dolphins already heavily laden with PCB poisoning which is known to include symptoms like impaired immune system, impaired liver function, and skin lesions, all of which were observed.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
14.
The passage is primarily concerned ████ █████████
Question Type
Implied
Purpose of passage
The author of this Phenomenon-Hypothesis passage critiques one hypothesis for why the dolphins died and then proposes an alternative hypothesis. She’s primarily concerned with finding the right explanation—the purpose of the passage is to assess the true cause of the dolphins’ deaths.
a
the effects of █ ███████████ █████████ █████████ ██ ████████ █████ ██████████ ████████
The author isn’t trying to assess the effects of anything—she’s assessing the cause of the dolphin die-off. The bacterial infection is just part of one theory on how the die-off occurred. It’s unknown whether there really was a bacterial infection, and the author’s interested in assessing two different hypotheses on exactly what caused the die-off.
b
the process by █████ █████████ ██ ████████ █████ ██████████ ████████ ████ █████████ █████████
Two problems. The author doesn’t suggest that the dolphins were ever correctly diagnosed—in fact, she rejects the explanation given by the research team that investigated the die-off. She also doesn’t discuss the research process much at all, other than to note that the dolphins were examined and tested for toxins. And she accepts the results of those tests without any assessment or critique. What she does assess, meanwhile, is the explanation the researchers offer to account for what those tests showed.
c
the weaknesses in ███ ████████ ███████████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████ ███████
Two problems. Yes, the author exposes weaknesses in one hypothesis for the dolphin die-off, but she doesn’t end there. She goes on to propose an alternative hypothesis. This tells us that her purpose isn’t just to critique the first hypothesis—it’s to find a better explanation. Also, her critique of the first hypothesis isn’t over its methodology. She doesn’t discuss methodology much at all, other than to note that the dolphins were examined and tested for toxins. And she accepts the results of those tests. Her critique is all about the explanation offered to account for what those tests showed.
d
possible alternative explanations ███ ███ ███████ ███████ ███████
The author assesses two alternative explanations—the brevetoxin hypothesis in P3 and the synthetic pollutants hypothesis in P4—in an effort to account for the cause of the die-off.
e
relative effects of ███████ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███████ █████████
The author doesn’t compare how deadly one pollutant is compared to another. Rather, she’s trying to find the correct cause of a single, large case of dolphin mortality. She does consider the kinds of effects that different pollutants can have on dolphins, but she doesn’t draw up a comparison between their relative effects—she just matches up the dolphins’ observed condition with the possible pollutant-based causes of that condition.
Difficulty
82% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%130
145
75%160
Analysis
Implied
Purpose of passage
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
4%
163
b
3%
159
c
10%
165
d
82%
168
e
2%
157
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.