PT103.S4.P4.Q25

PrepTest 103 - Section 4 - Passage 4 - Question 25

Hide analysis
P1

In England before 1660, a husband controlled his wife's property. ██ ███ ████ ███████████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ████████ █████ ██ ███████████ ███████ ████████ ██ █ █████████ ███

Intro topic / historical context · In late 17th and 18th centuries, marriage in England had features of a contract
Before 1660, husbands controlled wives' property. Implication that this changed after marriage started to become like a contract.
██████████ ████ █████████████ ██████ ████ ████ █████ ███████████ █ ████ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ████████ ████████ █████ █████ █████████ ███ ████████ █████████ ███ ███████ ███████████ ██ █████ ███
Historians' perspective · Contract aspect of marriage was a gain for women
It reflected changing views about democracy and property after 1660.
█████ ██████ ████████ ████ █████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ █████ ████████ █████████ ███ ███████ ████ ███████████ ███ █████ ████ ██████████ ██ ████████ █████████ █████ ███████ ███████████ ███████

Staves' perspective · Judicial decisions undermined any gains from marriage contracts
P2

███████ ███████ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ ██████ ████████████ █████ ███████ ███████ ████████ █ ████████ ██ █████████ ███ ██████████ █████████ ██████████ ███████ █████████ ██████ ███████████ ██ █████ ███ ███████ ████████ ████████ ████████████████████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ███ ████████ █████ █████ █████████ █████████ ██ █████ █████ █████ █████████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ █████ ███ █████████ ████████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ████ █████ ██████ █████ ██ █████ ███

Staves' support 1 · Definitions of men's and women's property was harmful to women
Example: property inherited by wives after husbands' death couldn't be sold. But property inherited by men from wives could be sold.
████████████ █████████████ ███ ████████ ████ █████████ ██ ███████████ ████ ███ ████████ █████████ ████ ██ █████████ ███ ██████ ███ ████████ ████████████ ████ ███████████ ██ ████████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ █ █████ █████ ███ ███ █████ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ ██████ ██ ███████████ █████ ████ ███████ ███ █████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ██████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ █████████ █ ████ █████ ███ ███ ███ █████ ████ ██ ██ █ ████ ██ ███████████████ ████████ █ ████ ████████████ ██████████ ████████ ███████████ ██████████ ███████ ████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ████ ██████ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██ █ ██████ █████ ██ █████ ██ █ ████████ ████████ ██ ██ ███████ ████ ████ █████████ ████ █ ██████████ ████████████ ████ █████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██████ █████ ███ ██████████ ███
Staves' support 2 · New legal concepts in connection with marriage contracts were unfair to women
Examples: certain limits on pin money and maintenance allowances.
██████████████████ ██████████ ███████████ █████ ████████████████ ███████ ████ ███████ ██████████████ ████ █████ ████ ███████ ███
Historians' response · These problems were minor and would disappear soon
██████ ██████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ █████████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ████████ ███████████ █████ █████████

Staves' response · Judges fell back to pre-1660 assumptions about property
P3

███████ ████ ██ ███████ ████████ ███ ███████ ████████████ ███ █████ ███████ █████ █████ ██ ██████████████████ ████████ ██████ ███████ ███ ████████ █████ ████ ████████ ███████████ ██████████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ███████████ ███ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███████████████████ ███

Implication of Staves' work 1 · Staves has changed her view on whether separate maintenance allowances were good for women
Before, she said they were good. Now, she thinks that's oversimplified.
███ ████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ███ ███████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ ██████ ███████ ███████ █████ ████████ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ███ █████████ ████████ ██████ ████ ███ ██████████ █████████ █████ ███████████ ███ ███ ████ ███████ █████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ████ █████████████ ██████ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ███ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███████████

Implication of Staves' work 2 · Challenges an assumption underlying Stones' view
Stones argued that in late 18th century, wealthy men married widows less often than they used to, because more people started to marry for love rather than for financial reasons. Staves counters the assumption that widows had more money than non-widows.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Show answer
25.

According to the passage, Staves' ████████ ███ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████████ █████ ████████ ██ ████ ██████████████████ ████████

a

Staves' research undermines ███ ██ ███ ███████ ███████████ ███ ████ ███ ███████████ ██████████ █████ ███████████

This is stated here. Staves’ research challenges the Stones’ view and undermines a key assumption, but she doesn’t completely undermine their claim.

79%
b

Staves' research refutes ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████

Anti-supported. The author actually states here that Staves’ research does not completely undermine the Stones’ contention.

10%
c

Staves' research shows ████ ███ ███████ ██████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ ████ █ ██████ ██ █████ ███████████ ███ █████████

Anti-supported. The author actually states here that Staves’ research does not completely undermine the Stones’ contention. Also, she only undermines one of their assumptions.

3%
d

Staves' research indicates ████ ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ███████ ██ ██ █████ ██ █████████████ █████

Anti-supported. The author actually states here that Staves’ research does not completely undermine the Stones’ contention.

4%
e

Staves' research qualifies ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████████ █████

Staves’ research doesn’t merely qualify the Stones’ contention. Instead, Staves challenges their argument by undermining one of their key assumptions.

4%

Confirm action

Are you sure?