As part of a survey, approximately 10,000 randomly selected individuals were telephoned and asked a number of questions about their income and savings. βββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ
The argument concludes that people become more unwilling to discuss personal finances with strangers over the phone throughout their lifetime. The author bases his conclusion on a survey that found that older people are more unwilling to discuss their personal finances with a surveyor over the phone than younger people are.
Our argument uses survey results about different generations of people to support a claim about how people change as they age. This conclusion doesnβt follow; if you want to make a claim about how peopleβs behaviors change throughout their lives, you should interview the same people at different points in their lives. All that the survey results tell us is how different generations differ behaviorally, not how one generation will change in the future.
The argument above is vulnerable ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ
offers no evidence ββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ
This addresses the issue of change over time. If we donβt know how the answers of the people surveyed would change over time, we cannot draw the conclusion about how anyoneβs behavior from earlier in their life to later.
fails to specify βββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββ
Knowing the exact number of people telephoned does not help our argumentβit would not help us establish a connection between the older and younger people surveyed and how people change throughout their lives.
assumes without warrant ββββ βββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββ
Even if it were untrue that age was the main determinant of these factors, that would not damage the argument. Our argument is not focused on the level of income or savings, but rather on how forthcoming people of certain ages are with this information.
assumes from the ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ β ββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ
This βcookie-cutterβ answer choice refers to circular reasoning, which is not present in this argument. The study would have had to assume that people become less likely to share this information as they age. Since this was not the case, we can reject this answer choice.
provides no reason ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββ β βββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ
Our argument is concerned with the difference between different age groups and how people change throughout their lives, not with whether or not generalizations are universally true within a group. This answer choice misses the mark.