PT105.S2.Q13 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

Yolanda concludes that joyriding is more dangerous than accessing computers without authorization and manipulating the computer’s data or programs. This is because joyriding physically endangers people, whereas the computer crime only harms property.

Arjun concludes that joyriding is not more dangerous than the computer crime. This is because unauthorized use of medical records systems might can causes physical harm to people by potentially damaging hospital data systems.

We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree on whether joyriding more dangerous than the computer crime. Yolanda thinks it is. Arjun thinks it’s not.

Arjun doesn’t express an opinion. Arjun doesn’t say anything about joyriding or whether it endangers people physically.

Arjun doesn’t express an opinion or agrees. He points out that access to records systems could damage data systems. If data systems are property, then Arjun agrees that the computer crime can damage property. If data systems are not property, then he says nothing about property.

Neither speaker has an opinion. The dispute is about which crime is more dangerous. Nobody connects the level of danger to what should be more or less criminal.

This is a point of disagreement. Yolanda thinks the unauthorized use of computers is not as dangerous to people as is joyriding. Arjun thinks it is, because of the potential of computer access to damage hospital records, which in turn can damage people.

Yolanda doesn’t express an opinion. She believes a crime that hurts only intellectual property isn’t as dangerous as joyriding. But she’s open to the computer crime being dangerous; just not as dangerous. And, she doesn’t say anything about crimes involving physical property.

PrepTest 105 - Section 2 - Question 13

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action