Some people have been promoting a new herbal mixture as a remedy for the common cold. ███ ███████ █████████ █████ █████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████ ██████████ ███ ███████████ █ ████ █████████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ █████ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ █ ████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ █████ █████ ███ ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ██ █████████ ███ ███████████
The cold sufferer claims that this mixture is not an effective remedy because many people have colds but don’t use it. If the remedy were effective, the sufferer argues, then most people with colds would be using it.
The argument fails to consider a number of possible explanations as to why the medication isn’t widely used that wouldn’t imply that it’s ineffective. It’s possible that the medication is rare or expensive, or that there are other equally or more effective options being chosen instead.
The sufferer assumes that the remedy being ineffective is the only possible explanation for why it isn’t being widely used.
Each of the following is ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ██████████ ████████ ███████
Enough of the ███████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ █ █████
The mixture does ███ ████ ████ ███████ ██████ ██████ ██ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ █████ █████ ███
The mixture is ████████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██████ █████████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ██████
The mixture is ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ █ ████ ██ █████ ██ ███
There are no █████████ ████ ████████ █████████ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████