PT113.S4.Q10

PrepTest 113 - Section 4 - Question 10

Show analysis

Lydia: Red squirrels are known to make holes in the bark of sugar maple trees and to consume the trees' sap. █████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███████████ █████ ████ █ █████ █████████████ ██ ██████ ███ █████████ ██████ █████████ ███ █████ ██████ █████ ██ ██████ █████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ █████ ███████ ██ ██████ █████ █████ █████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ███ ██ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███████ █████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████████ █████ ███ ██████

███████ ██ ████ ██ █████████ █████ ████ ██████ ███████ ███ █████████████ ██ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ██ ██ ███ ████ █ ████████ █████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ██████ ██ ███ ██ ███ ███ ███████████ ██████ ██ ██████

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis

Lydia starts by describing a phenomenon: red squirrels make holes in the bark of sugar maple trees and consume their sap. She lays out two alternative explanations for this phenomenon: the squirrels are seeking either water or sugar, which are the two main components of sugar maple sap. Lydia then rules out the possibility that they are seeking water, since water is more easily available from other sources. Thus, Lydia concludes the explanation for this behavior is that the squirrels are seeking sugar.

Describe Method of Reasoning

Lydia reaches her conclusion by a process of elimination. She states two alternative explanations for the squirrels' behavior, then eliminates one of them — the idea that the squirrels are seeking water — which leaves the other one, the sugar hypothesis, remaining.

User Avatar Analysis by ArdaschirArguelles
Show answer
10.

Lydia's argument proceeds by

a

dismissing potentially disconfirming ████

b

citing a general ████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ ██ █ ████████ ████████

c

presenting an observed ██████ ██ ████ ██ █ ██████ ███████ ██ ████████

d

drawing an analogy ███████ ███████████████ █████████ ███ ██ ███████████ ██████████

e

rejecting a possible ███████████ ███████████ ███ ██ ████████ ██████████

Confirm action

Are you sure?