After 1950, in response to record growth in worldwide food demand, farmers worldwide sharply increased fertilizer use. ββ β βββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ ββ β βββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ
Fertilizer was very effective at increasing farmland productivity in the past. Given that farmers want to increase productivity even more, why has the use of fertilizer declined slightly in recent years?
The correct answer must explain why farmers seeking to increase productivity have reduced their use of fertilizer, despite it having been very effective in the past. Itβs likely that something has changed since 1985 that either reduced fertilizer's effectiveness or farmersβ ability to use it.
Which one of the following, ββ βββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββ
Since 1985 the ββββ ββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ
A relative shortage of available farmland would create an even greater need to use land efficiently. Also, the stimulus already establishes that farmers seek to increase productivity. This makes the reduction in the use of fertilizer even more confusing.
Several varieties of ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββββββ
So we're growing some new crops, but this tells us that fertilizer is just as effective on the new crops. That doesn't give us any reason why fertilizer isnβt used as much today.
Between 1950 and ββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ
The stimulus already establishes that fertilizer led to a massive increase in farmland productivity. Given that fact, why did farmers reduce their use of fertilizer in the following years? This doesn't tell us.
After fertilizer has ββββ βββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββββββ
This gives us reason to believe that fertilizerβs effectiveness plateaus at a certain point, which explains why farmers decreased their use of it over the years. Why spend money on fertilizer that is now ineffective?
Between 1975 and ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ
The correct answer must explain why fertilizer use declined after 1985. Factors influencing fertilizer production before that time are irrelevant, so this isn't helpful.