Hospital auditor: The Rodríguez family stipulated that the funds they donated to the neurological clinic all be used to minimize patients' suffering. ███ ██████ ██████████████ ██ ███████ █████████ █████ ██████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████ ███ █████ ██ █████ █████ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ██████████ █████████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ████ █████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████
██████ ██████████████ ███ ███ ██████████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ████ █████ █████ █████████ ██ ████ ████████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██████ ████████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ████████████ █████████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ ███ ███ ███████ █████ █████ ████████████ █████████ █████ ████████ ███████
The hospital auditor argues that the hospital is violating the terms of a donation, which specified funds must be used to minimize patients’ suffering. Why is there a violation? The clinic is using a portion of the money to research new diagnostic technology. And it seems the auditor assumes that diagnostic technology does not help to minimize suffering.
The clinic administrator disagrees with the auditor's conclusion, coming to the implied conclusion that the hospital is complying with the terms and using the funds to reduce suffering. This is because new technologies will allow early diagnosis of some disorders, and patients who are treated early usually suffer much less. By offering this explanation, the administrator rebuts the auditor's assumption about diagnostic technology.
Which one of the following ██ ███ ████ █████ ██ █████ ███████ ███ ████████ ███████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████████████
whether early treatment ██ ████ ████████████ █████████ ███████ ███ █████████ ██████████ ████ █████ █████████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ███████████ ████ █████████
Neither speaker discusses this claim. Even the clinic administrator, who talks about early treatment reducing suffering, never specifies whether the reduction is partial or whether it can eliminate suffering.
whether the patients █████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██████ ███ █████████ █████████ ████████ █████████ ███ ███ ████████████ █████████ ████ █████ ████ ██████
Neither speaker talks about this point. The auditor and administrator are arguing about the use of donated funds, not about the actual quality of care patients are currently receiving.
whether the Rodríguez ██████ ███████ ██████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ █████████ █████████
The hospital auditor agrees that this is the case, but the clinic administrator never disagrees. The administrator doesn’t directly say anything about the terms of the donation.
whether the neurological ██████ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████
The auditor thinks that this is not true, while the administrator thinks that it is: this is the disagreement. The auditor explicitly states that the clinic is violating the conditions. The administrator, though, explains how the clinic is actually using the money as required.
whether the Rodríguez ██████ ███████████ ████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██████ █████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ████████████
Neither speaker makes this claim. Neither the hospital auditor nor the clinic administrator says anything about the specific ways that the Rodríguez family expected the money to be used.
Difficulty
97% of people who answer get this correct
This is a low-difficulty question.
Analysis
Stems that ask us to identify a statement to which one speaker in the stimulus would say "Yes" and the other would say "No."
Answer Popularity
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnostic