PT106.S1.Q13 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

The stimulus can be diagrammed as follows:

Mismatched conclusion. The conclusion of the stimulus comes from taking the contrapositive of a conditional relationship given in the premises. The conclusion of (A) is a completely new idea that was not discussed in the premises.

Mismatched structure. This is not an argument with premises that support a conclusion; this is just two facts.

The diagram of (C) parallels the diagram of the stimulus:

Mismatched conclusion. The conclusion of the stimulus comes from taking the contrapositive of a conditional relationship given in the premises. The conclusion of (D) is a completely new idea that was not discussed in the premises.

Mismatched premises and conclusion. (E) does not operate by giving a conditional relationship, failing the necessary condition, then concluding with the negation of the sufficient condition. Instead, (E) outlines a correlation (people with lots of friends tend to go out a lot so they need cars), then makes a conclusion that if someone wants a certain result (having lots of friends), then that person should take the action correlated with that result.

PrepTest 106 - Section 1 - Question 13

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action