Private industry is trying to attract skilled research scientists by offering them high salaries. ██ █ ███████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ████████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ ██████ ███████████████████ ████████ ██████████ ███ █████████ ████ ██ █ █████ ██ ██████ ████ ████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ██████ ██ ████ ███ ████ ███████ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ █████ ██████████ █████ ████ ████████ ███████ ██████████████ █████
The author argues that the government will likely lose its skilled researchers to the higher-paying private sector unless those researchers are sufficiently motivated by a sense of public duty.
The argument fails to consider that there could be a number of possible incentives to work for the government other than a sense of public duty. In order to conclude that researchers must be motivated by a sense of public duty if they’re to stay with the government, the author must assume that there is nothing else that could incentivize them to stay.
Which one of the following ██ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ████████
Government research scientists ███ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██████████████ ███ █████ ████████ █████████████ ████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███████
None of the ████████ ██████████ █████████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████ ████ ████ ███ ████████████ ███████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███████
The government does ███ ██████ ██ ████ ████████ ██████████ ███ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ █████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ █████ ███████ ████████ ███████████
The government does ███ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ████ █████████ ████ ███████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ████████ ████ ████ ████ ██████████ ███ ███ █████ ████████ ████ ████████
Research scientists employed ██ ███ ███████ ██████ █████████ ████ ██████ █████ ████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████████