Some environmentalists question the prudence of exploiting features of the environment, arguing that there are no economic benefits to be gained from forests, mountains, or wetlands that no longer exist. ████ █████████████████ █████ ████ ███████ ██████ ███ █████████ █████ ██ █████ ██ █████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███
Some environmentalists don't think it's a great idea to exploit the environment, because when the environment is all used up no one can economically benefit from it. Many environmentalists don’t think it's a great idea to exploit the environment because, economics aside, the environment has inherent value.
Environmentalists take different approaches to rationalizing why environmental exploitation is bad. Some focus on economic costs/benefits, while others don’t.
Which one of the following ███ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ ███ ████████
It is economically █████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████████
This could be false. We know this is the opinion of some environmentalists—that doesn’t mean it’s true.
Some environmentalists appeal ██ █ ███████████ █████████████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████████
This must be true. The stimulus says many environmentalists think environmental exploitation is bad because nature has inherent value, and they don’t consider the economic benefits/costs in their justification. We know these people exist, which means (B) must be true.
Most environmentalists appeal ██ ████████ ███████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████████
This could be false. We don’t anything about what “most” environmentalists think—we only know about “some” and “many”.
Many environmentalists provide ████ █ ███████████ █████████████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████████
This could be false. While we know many environmentalists offer a noneconomic justification against environmental exploitation, we don’t know that this is their only justification—it could be one of many.
Even if there ██ ██ ████████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ████████████ █████ ██ █ █████ ███████████ █████████████ ███ █████ ███
This could be false. We know this is the opinion of some environmentalists—that doesn’t mean it’s true.