PT106.S3.Q11

PrepTest 106 - Section 3 - Question 11

Hide analysis

Support A rise in the percentage of all 18-year-olds who were recruited by the armed services of a small republic between 1980 and 1986 correlates with a rise in the percentage of young people who dropped out of high school in that republic. █████ ████████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ █████████ ██████ ████ ██████ █████████ ██ ████ ██████ █████████ ███ ███████████ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ███████████ █████ ███ ████████████ ██████ █████████████ ██ ███████████ █████ ███ ████ ██████ █████████

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis

The author hypothesizes that a small republic’s military recruitment rate for 18-year-olds is largely dependent on the recruitment rate for high school dropouts. This hypothesis is based on an observed correlation over 6 years: as the proportion of high school dropouts increased, so did the recruitment rate for 18-year-olds. Additionally, 18-year-olds in the republic are usually either high school graduates or dropouts.

Notable Assumptions

The author assumes that just because the proportion of dropouts and the recruitment rate for 18-year-olds increased at the same time, most 18-year-old military recruits are dropouts. In other words, the author assumes that the correlation was caused by the military being able to recruit more dropouts, and that they weren’t instead recruiting more graduates.

Show answer
11.

Which one of the following ███████████ ██ █████ ████ ███████ ███ █████████

a

A larger number ██ ███████████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ █████████ ███ ███ ██████████ █████ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██ █████

This does not weaken the argument, which is about proportions and rates, not about absolute numbers. The number of 18-year-old graduate recruits increasing implies nothing about their recruitment rate, which could have increased, decreased, or stayed the same.

b

Many of the ███████████████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████ ████████ ███ ██ ████████ ████ ██ ███████████ ███ ████ █████████ █ ████ ██████ ██████████

This does not weaken the argument because who is able to operate military technology is unrelated to who the military is able to recruit. We also don’t know how many people are needed to operate the tech: maybe it’s just a few, so they could still mostly recruit dropouts.

c

Between 1980 and ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████ ██████ █████████ █████ ████████████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ████████

This weakens the argument, because it rebuts the author’s assumption that the observed correlation implied a causal link. This instead shows us that the increased recruitment rate was not dependent on recruiting more dropouts, but rather more graduates.

d

Personnel of the ██████████ █████ ████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ █████ ████ ██████ ██████████

This does not weaken the argument, because the domain of the argument is limited to who the republic’s military is recruiting. Whatever education people pursue after they have already been recruited is irrelevant.

e

The proportion of ████████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ █████████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ██ █████

This does not weaken the argument, because the argument is purely about 18-year-old recruits, who we already know are usually either high school graduates or high school dropouts. Recruits who join later, after several years of college, are outside the argument’s domain.

Confirm action

Are you sure?