Self-study
P1
In recent years, a growing belief that the way society decides what to treat as true is controlled through largely unrecognized discursive practices has led legal reformers to examine the complex interconnections between narrative and law. ██ ████ █████ ████████ █████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ███████ █████ ███████ ███████ ██████ █████████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███
Context ·
How do we decide what is true or false?
Legal systems use competing narratives about events; judges and juries assign "truth"
Introduce concept ·
Objectivism
The "objective" view is neutral, unbiased, and more reliable than other views
Apply concept ·
of objectivism to legal "truth"
Truth is found in an objective view of events
Criticism ·
No one holds an objective view
Support criticism ·
According to psychologists, everyone holds biases
Author's perspective ·
Legal views are subjective, not objective
P2
███ ████████ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████████ ██ █████ █████████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██ ██ ███████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ██████████ █████ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ██████
Problem ·
Objectivist assumptions favor those with legal training
Accounts by those who understand the law are (wrongly) seen as objective and true; others accounts are (wrongly) seen as false
P3
█████ ████████ ████ ██ ████████ █████████ ███████ █████ ███ ████ ███████ ████ ██████ ███████████ ███ ███ ██████ █████ ██ ██████ ███████ ███ ████████████ ██ ███████████ █████ ███████████ ███
Solution ·
according to some legal scholars
Alternative legal narratives
Explain solution ·
Replace abstract objectivist discourse with personal narratives
Support solution ·
Personal stories elicit empathy
Implications of solution ·
Disruption of status quo, less advantage bestowed by legal training, emphasis on empathy
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
12.
It can be inferred from ███ ███████ ████ █████████ █████ ███ ███████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ██ █ ███████ █████████ ██ █████ ███████
a
incorporating into the ███ ███ ██████ ████████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ███ ██████████
We have no evidence that the scholars want to bring into legal discourse development in psychology and philosophy. These subjects just aren’t mentioned as something they want to include.
b
eradicating from legal █████████ █████████ ████ █ ██████████ █████ ██ ████
The scholars don’t want to eliminate discourse having a particular point of view. They want to
c
granting all participants ██ █████ ███████████ █████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████████████ ██ █████ █████████
These scholars don’t advocate more training in the forms of legal discourse. They want to
d
making the law ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████████ ██ █ █████ ███████ ██ ██████
Supported. The scholars want to
e
instilling an appreciation ██ █████ ███████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███ ███ ████████████ ██ █ █████ ██████████
We have no evidence these scholars want to encourage appreciation of legal history and methodology. They want to