PT108.S1.P2.Q14

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16

PASSAGE 3

Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24

SECTION 3 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

We have no reason to think the scholars believe personal stories adhere at all to the principles of objectivism. Objectivism involves a neutral description of events rather than subjective experiences.

Not supported, because the author suggests personal stories can disturb the tranquility of law. So we have no reason to think the scholars believe personal stories will be more likely to bring tranquility.

We have no reason to think the scholars believe personal stories are more likely to lead to accurate reconstruction of facts. None of the points they make in P4 regarding personal narratives relates to getting a more accurate understanding of facts.

The author mentions that all observers bring a set of “expectations, values, and beliefs” that determine what they can see and hear. So we know that these things can influence what is observed. We have no evidence the scholars believe that these things are more likely to influence personal stories than they are to influence other kinds of discourse. We don’t get any mention of the scholars’ belief concerning what influences personal stories, nor do we get a comparison of that influence to all other kinds of discourse.