PT109.S4.Q4 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22

PASSAGE 4

Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

Muriel believes that Favilla is not a great writer, because her subject matter isn’t varied enough.

John states that having varied subject matter is not required to be a great writer. Rather, a great writer must have the ability to explore a theme deeply.

Favilla might be a great writer, even if her subject matter isn’t varied.

Strongly supported, because John states that varied subject matter is not a requirement for being a great writer. So one can be a great writer even if one’s subject matter is not varied.

This is anti-supported, because John states that ability to explore themes deeply is a requirement for being a great writer.

John doesn’t state what is sufficient to consider someone a great writer. He describes one necessary condition for being a great writer, but this doesn’t support a claim that someone deserves to be considered a great writer.

John does not state that having exceptionally varied subject matter prevents one from being a great writer.

John does not state that having a distinctive style is a requirement for being considered a great writer.

PrepTest 109 - Section 4 - Question 4

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action