Self-study
Editorial: Conclusion The government should not fund any part of its health services with lottery revenue. █████ ██████ ████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███████ █████ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ █ ██████ ██████████
Summary
The editorialist concludes that the government should not fund healthcare services with lottery revenue. This is because lottery revenue may decline in the future, but healthcare is an essential service. So if lottery revenue did decline, the government would need to scramble to make up the resulting budget shortfall.
Notable Assumptions
The editorialist establishes that lottery revenue may not always be reliable, but doesn't directly state that this disqualifies it from being a revenue source for healthcare due to healthcare's essential status. In other words, the editorialist makes an assumption about what types of revenue should be used to fund essential services.
The argument conforms to the principle that revenue sources which could decline significantly should not be used to fund essential services. The correct answer will state a principle equivalent to this.
3.
The argument in the editorial ████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
a
Governments should spend ████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ ██ ████████████ █████████
The editorialist only claims that the funding for healthcare shouldn’t be sourced from lottery revenue. The argument doesn't contain any claims about the amount of funding that should go to different services, so this isn't relevant.
b
Essential government services ████ ██ ██████ ████ ████████ ███████ ██ ████████
This reflects the editorialist’s reasoning that lottery revenue should not fund essential services like healthcare, because it might decline in the future. That reasoning is held together by the idea that essential services should have stable funding.
c
No government service ██████ ██ ████████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███████ ███ ███ ████████
The editorialist only makes a claim about essential government services, so this principle is much broader than the editorialist’s reasoning. This doesn't reflect the importance the editorialist places on healthcare being an essential service.
d
Governments should consider ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████
The editorialist makes a claim about where revenue for essential services should be sourced from, not about what services should be considered essential. Healthcare being an essential service is stated as a premise, but this principle treats it as a conclusion.
e
At least some ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████
The editorialist only claims that lottery revenue shouldn’t be used as the source of funding for essential services. The argument doesn't include any claims about how lottery revenue should be treated beyond that, so this is irrelevant.