Conclusion Novelists cannot become great as long as they remain in academia. ██████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████ █████ ███████ ████████████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████████ ███ ██ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ ██ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ██ █████████ ██ ████████ ████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ █████ ██ █████████
The author concludes that novelists can’t be great if they remain in academia. In other words, in order to be great, they need to be outside of academia.
Why?
Because in order to get an intuitive grasp of the emotions of everyday life, one must be outside academia.
Notice that the conclusion brings up a new concept — what’s required to be a “great” novelist. The premise doesn’t say anything about what’s required to be a great novelist. All that the premise establishes is that in order to have an intuitive grasp of emotions, one cannot be in academia. So what makes the author think one must leave academic in order to be a great novelist? The author is assuming that in order to be a great novelist, you need to have an intuitive grasp of the emotions of everyday life.
Which one of the following ██ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ████████
Novelists require some ████████████ ██ ███ ██ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ █████
No great novelist █████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████
Participation in life, ████████████ ████ █████████ ███████████ ██ █████ █████ █████████ ██████
Novelists cannot be █████ ███████ ██ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ █████
Knowledge of the ████████ ██ ████████ ████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████ █████████ ███ █████████ █████