PT111.S3.Q10

PrepTest 111 - Section 3 - Question 10

Show analysis

Goswami: Conclusion I support the striking workers at Ergon Foods. ████ ███ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ████ ████ ███████ ███ █████

█████████ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██████ █ ████ █████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ████ ████████

Speaker 1 Summary

Goswami supports the striking workers at Ergon Foods. This is because she thinks the amount they are paid (most make less than $20,000 per year) is too low.

Speaker 2 Summary

Nordecki concludes that if the strike is about pay, he does not support the strike. This is because the average annual salary of the striking workers is above $29,000.

Objective

We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree about whether the striking workers are underpaid. Goswami thinks they are. Nordecki thinks they aren’t.

User Avatar Analysis by KevinLin
Show answer
10.

Goswami and Nordecki disagree over ███ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████

a

The average annual ██████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ████ ████████

b

Pay is the ███████ █████ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ██████

c

It is reasonable ██ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ ███ ██████████

d

The striking workers ██ █████ █████ ███ ██████████

e

It was unreasonable ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ██ ██ ███████

Confirm action

Are you sure?