Support Books updating the classification systems used by many libraries are not freeβin fact they are very expensive. βββ ββββ βββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββ β ββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ
The author concludes that changes to library classification systems are a scheme used by publishers to increase sales. The author supports this statement by stating that the new books that fit into the new classification system are expensive, and the only way to get someone to buy them is to convince them they need the latest classification system.
This argument fails to link convincing buyers they need the new books with the conclusion that the new systems are simply money-making ploys. The author never said in the premises that the new systems provide no benefit to the buyer; each new generation of the system could be more useful to libraries than the last. If this were the case, then selling these new books to libraries would not be a ploy for more sales, because they would actually benefit the libraries.
The reasoning above is most ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββ
claims without providing βββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββ
concludes that a ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββββ
fails to consider ββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββ
concludes that there ββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββββββββ βββββββ
fails to consider ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ