The government-owned gas company has begun selling stoves and other gas appliances to create a larger market for its gas. █████████ ███ ████ ████ ████████ ████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ████ ████ █████ ███████████ ████ ███ ████ ███ ████████ ███ ████████████████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ███ █████ ██ █ ███████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ██████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ███ ██████ █████ █████ ██ ███████ █████ ████ █████
It would be alright if a private gas company started selling stoves and similar gas appliances. It is therefore alright that the government-owned gas company started selling stoves and similar gas appliances.
This argument draws a conclusion about what’s okay for government-owned businesses based on a claim that it would be appropriate for a private business, but doesn’t provide any explicit statement telling us that whatever is okay for a private business is also okay for a government-owned business. There’s instead only an assumption that the government-owned business doesn’t have to meet different standards from a private business. We’re looking for some principle that satisfies this assumption, and provides a connection between what is alright for a private business and what is alright for a government-owned business.
Which one of the following ███████████ ██ ██████ ████ █████ ██ ███████ ███ █████████ ██████
Government-owned companies have ███ █████ ██ ██ ████████ ███████ ██████████ ████ ███ █████ ██ ███
This justifies how the argument get to its conclusion - if government-owned businesses can do whatever private businesses can do, and private businesses could sell stoves, then of course government owned businesses could sell stoves.
A government should ██████ ████ █████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ██████████
Leads to the wrong conclusion. The argument is suggesting that the government shouldn’t worry about the complaints of merchants, because it’s alright for the government-owned business to be selling stoves.
Private businesses have ██ █████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████████ ███████████
Wrong trigger. The argument is suggesting that government monopolies do have a right to compete with private businesses - this answer choice provides the opposite.
There is nothing █████ ████ █ ████████████████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████
Wrong trigger. In this case, the argument states that the owners of private companies are complaining.
There is nothing █████ ████ ███████ █████████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██████
Wrong trigger. This argument is about whether a government-onwed business can compete with private companies, not about competition between private companies.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.
By signing up you agree to our
terms of service.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.