Aaron: A prominent judge, criticizing "famous lawyers who come before courts ill-prepared to argue their cases," recently said, "This sort of cavalier attitude offends the court and can do nothing but harm to the client's cause." I find the judge's remarks irresponsible.
████████ █ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ██ █████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ ██████████ ██████ ██ ███████████ █████████
An important judge criticized famous lawyers who aren’t prepared to argue their cases in court. Aaron asserts that the judge’s comments were irresponsible.
Belinda asserts that the judge was good to make that criticism. This is because letting the lawyers know about the damage caused by their lack of preparation is a responsible thing to do.
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree about whether the judge’s criticism was responsible. Aaron believes it wasn’t. Belinda believes it was.
The point at issue between █████ ███ ███████ ██ ███████
ill-prepared lawyers damage █████ ████████ ██████
the judge's criticism ██ ███████ ██ █████████████
a lawyer's being ████████████ ██ █████ █ ████████ ████ ███████████ ██████████
famous lawyers have █ ███████ ██████████████ ██ ██ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ███ ███ ██████
it is to ██ ████████ ████ ████████████ ███████ █████ ██████ ███ █████ ██ █████ ████ ██████