PT115.S2.Q4 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16

PASSAGE 3

Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23

PASSAGE 4

Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28

SECTION 4 · lr

Julia concludes Marie’s claim that it is not morally wrong to keep an extra 10 dollars is nonsense. To support her claim, Julia similarly argues that she would not be morally entitled to keep Marie’s coat for herself if Marie were to mistakenly hand the coat to her.

Julia counters the position held by Marie. She does this by presenting an analogous argument with a conclusion opposite to the conclusion drawn by Marie.

Julia does not accept the principle Marie describes. In fact, Julia explicitly rejects this principle by concluding she would not be morally entitled to keep Marie’s coat.

Julia does not accept Marie’s conclusion. In fact, she explicitly rejects Marie’s conclusion as nonsense.

The relevantly similar situation is Julia’s analogy of keeping Marie’s coat. In this analogy, Julia reaches a conclusion opposite of Marie’s conclusion.

Julia does not present a problem she currently faces. We cannot assume her analogy of keeping Marie’s coat is an actual moral problem she currently faces.

Julia does not propose her own principle. She only addresses the principle Marie proposes and explicitly rejects it. We cannot assume that just because Julia rejects a principle, she is proposing her own.

PrepTest 115 - Section 2 - Question 4

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action