Self-paced
Jorge: Conclusion You won't be able to write well about the rock music of the 1960s, since Support you were just an infant then. ████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ██ █████ █████ ███ █████ █████████
█████ ████ █████████ ██ ███████ █████ ███ ██████ ███████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███████ █████ ████████ ████ ██████ █████ ███████ ███ █████████ ███ █ ████ ██ ███████ █████ ████████ ███ ██████ ██ █████ █████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ ████ █████ ███ █████ ██ █ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ ███ ██████
Speaker 1 Summary
Jorge concludes that Ruth can’t write well about rock music of the 1960s. This is because that music was created by and for people in their teens and early twenties, and Ruth was only a baby at that time.
Speaker 2 Summary
Ruth’s conclusion (expressed in a rhetorical question) is that her age does not prevent her from writing well about music of the 1960s. As support, she points out that living people can write well about ancient Roman culture despite not being a part of ancient Roman culture.
7.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ██ ██ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████
a
whether only those ██████ ███ ████ ██ █████ █████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ██ █████████ ██ █████ █████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ████ ██████
This is the point of disagreement.
Jorge: ✅Ruth: ❌
Jorge thinks being in your teens or early twenties during the 1960s is required to write about that rock music, so only those people qualify. Ruth denies it, since her Roman example shows you do not need to have been part of something to write well about it.
Lots of people don't like (A) because it says "qualified to write about," but the stimulus is about writing "well." Does "qualified" sneak in a different standard, like a credential? No. Jorge's whole point is about whether someone is able to do this well, since he says Ruth "won't be able to write well." Saying only the 1960s age group is "qualified to write about" the music is just a looser way of saying only that group can do it well. In any case, what else are you going to pick? We're just being asked to pick the answer that "most accurately" represents what's at issue. "Most accurately" doesn't mean "perfectly, with completely airtight logic."
b
whether people who ████ ██ █████ █████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ████ ██████
Not a point of disagreement.
Jorge: ✅Ruth: ✅
Both speakers could agree that people who were teens or twenties in the 1960s can write well about the music. Jorge likely thinks so, since they are the group the music was made for, and Ruth has no reason to deny it. With both saying being open to saying yes, there is nothing in dispute.
c
whether only people ███ ███ ████ █████ █████ ████████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███████ ████████
Jorge: ❓Ruth: ❓
Jorge never comments on ancient cultures or what it takes to write about them. Ruth brings up ancient Rome only as an example, and she does not claim that only people past their early twenties can write well about ancient cultures. Neither takes a side here.
d
whether people who ███ ███ ███ ██ █████ █████ ██ █████ ████████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ █████
Not a point of disagreement.
Jorge: ❓Ruth: ✅
This is about people's age now, but Jorge's requirement is about age during the 1960s. Someone who is no longer young today, but who was a teenager back then, could write well on Jorge's view. So Jorge does not deny that people not currently in their teens or twenties can write well about the music, and Ruth agrees age is no barrier. No clash.
e
whether Ruth's ideas █████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ██ █████ █████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ████ ██████
Neither speaker has an opinion on this.
Jorge: ❓Ruth: ❓
Nobody discusses whether Ruth's ideas would appeal to the people who were teens or twenties in the 1960s. The debate is about writing well, which is not the same as having ideas that appeal to that group.