Geneticist: Billions of dollars are spent each year on high-profile experiments that attempt to link particular human genes with particular personality traits. ββββββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ β βββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ
A significant amount of money is spent on ambitious but unpractical scientific experiments, while more simple and practical experiments are underfunded. Therefore, funding for the ambitious projects should be decreased, and funding for other projects should be increased.
The argument moves from a claim about the relative practicality of two types of projects, to a claim that funding should prioritize the more practical of the two. It doesnβt, however, explain why this is the case - why the smaller scale but more practical projects ought to be prioritized. To justify this, we need some principle that fills this gap, and tells us why the more practical projects deserve more funding and the less practical projects deserve less funding.
Which one of the following βββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββ
Experiments that have βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ β βββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ
Wrong trigger. Nothing in the argument discusses how much potential to help the whole human race either type of project has.
Experiments that focus ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ
The argument has already told us that the first set of projects is less practical than the second - what we need is something explaining why that matters.
Experiments that help βββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββ
Wrong trigger. While the argument tells us that the second experiment does make plants more nutritious, it does not tell us that the first only helps us prevent undesirable personality traits.
Experiments that have ββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββββββ
This explains why the relative practicality of each experiment matters and fills the gap between the premises and the conclusion. If the more practical projects are more worthwhile, that explains why we should provide them with more funding.
Experiments that get ββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ βββ βββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ
Wrong trigger. While the argument notes that the first type are high-profile, the focus is not on either media attention or public support for the projects - it is instead on their practicality.