PT116.S3.Q15

PrepTest 116 - Section 3 - Question 15

Hide analysis

In 1975, a province reduced its personal income tax rate by 2 percent for most taxpayers. ██ █████ ███ ████████ ██████ ███ ████ ███ █████ █████████ ███ █████ ███████ ██ █ ████████ ███████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ █████ █████████ ████ ████████ ██████ █████ ████████ ████████ ████ ████ ██ ████ ███ ████ █████████████ ██ █████

"Surprising" Phenomenon

A province reduced its income tax rate for most taxpayer over a two-year period, so why did it bring in more money from income taxes in those years?

Objective

This is an except question: the four incorrect answers will somehow be helpful in explaining why the province collected more money from income taxes. Perhaps the taxpayers began earning higher incomes during this period, or maybe the number of taxpayers increased. The correct answer, however, will either be irrelevant or make the discrepancy even harder to resolve.

Show answer
15.

Each of the following, if █████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ███████████ █████████ █████ ███████

a

The years 1975 ███ ████ ████ ████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███████████

If the economy was prosperous, then people presumably earned more money, meaning that they could have paid more in taxes despite the lower tax rate.

6%
b

The definition of █████████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████████ ████ ████████ ████████████

This tells us that the province applied its personal income tax more broadly, which could explain how it collected more money with a lower tax rate: the rate was applied to more income.

5%
c

The personal income ███ ████ ███ ███ ██████████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██████ ████ ███ █████

The stimulus only tells us that the tax rate was reduced for most taxpayers. If the tax rate was increased for the highest earners, then that could explain how more money was collected during that period.

5%
d

The province's total ███████ ████ ███ █████ █████████ ██████ ████ ████ ███ █████

This is both redundant and irrelevant. We already know that personal income tax revenue increased, and other taxes are irrelevant to explaining the increased income tax revenue. So this isn't helpful to resolve the discrepancy.

78%
e

A large number ██ ██████ ████ █████ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ ████ ███ █████

More people living in the province would likely mean more people paying taxes, which could explain why revenues increased under a lower tax rate.

6%

Confirm action

Are you sure?