The tidal range at a particular location is the difference in height between high tide and low tide. βββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββ βββ ββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββββ βββββββ
The author puts forward a theory that tidal rangesβthe difference between a tideβs highest and lowest pointsβmust be explained only in terms of gravitational force since thatβs the tidesβ only cause.
The argument fails to consider that while an event may have just one cause, it can still be affected by other forces. There could be many factors such as geography, weather, etc. that all impact how high or low a tide rises or falls. Even though these factors donβt directly cause tides to occur, they can certainly exert some kind of influence on their ranges.
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ β ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ
It gives only βββ βββββββ ββ β βββββ ββββββ
This isnβt a flaw. The Bay of Fundy is given as one example of a tidal range, but the argumentβs logic wouldn't be affected whether there were more examples or none at all.
It fails to ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ β βββββ βββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ
This describes how the author assumes that other factors donβt affect tidal ranges simply because they arenβt causes of tides. For example, a rainstorm might cause the water level to be higher, though rain doesnβt directly cause a tide.
It does not ββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ β βββββββββ βββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ
This is irrelevant. Even if low and high tides are measured differently, this doesn't affect the potential explanations for the size of a tidal range. The magnitude of a tidal range is still the difference between high tide height and low tide height, and we still know that only gravity is involved in inducing tides.
It presumes, without βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββ ββ β ββββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββββββββ βββββββ
This is descriptively inaccurateβthe argument doesnβt do this. It says that gravity causes tides, but never mentions any other activities in the ocean. So the author never assumes anything about "most" activity within the world's oceans.
It does not βββββββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ
This is an irrelevant distinction. The argument uses as a premise the fact that only gravitational forces of the sun and moon affect tidal ranges. This fact is still true even if there are potential differences in how the sun and moon affect the tide.