This doesn’t capture the passage’s focus on the Hippocratic oath. The passage isn’t about the general topic of conflicting ideas about medical ethics. It’s about a specific oath and what should be done with it. In addition, the author does not focus on comparing modern ideas about ethics to ancient ones; although a difference between modern ideas and ancient ones is mentioned as part of critics’ argument concerning the oath, that comparison isn’t the focus of the author’s argument in P2.

This title is too focused on the motivations of the critics. It doesn’t capture the broader topic of what should be done with the Hippocratic oath. In addition, the reference to “managed care” is part of just one point made by the critics; there’s no reason the title of the passage should mention managed care.

The author’s point that the origins of the oath don’t matter is simply one minor point in support of the broader rejection of the critics’ views. So (C) is too narrow to be the main point.

This doesn’t fit, because the author isn’t trying to break away from ancient ideas. Rather, the author wants to retain the core value of the oath, not break away from it.

This is the best title, because it captures the question of whether the oath needs dramatic changes (”Major Surgery”) or only minor adaptation (”Facelift”). The author argues for only minor adaptation.