Example Β·Of obstacles to recognition of rights by provincial courts
Provincial courts interpret the right to recognition of customs as applying only to customs held prior to colonization; but aboriginal societies lack legal documentation from that time
Itβs tough to anticipate something specific, but the correct answer is likely to be supported by P2 or P3, where the author describes some of the difficulties that have resulted from courtsβ interpretation of constitutional language.
Supported. Since aboriginal societies often relied on oral tradition rather than written records, many societies arenβt able to establish that their customs are long-standing under courtsβ current interpretation of the legal documentation requirement. The author would probably agree that it makes sense for courts to at least sometimes accept oral evidence to accommodate certain aboriginal societiesβ style of discourse.
Too extreme. The author doesnβt suggest anywhere in the passage that aboriginal peoples should be granted βfull protectionβ of βallβ customs.
Not supported, because the author isnβt opposed to having courts interpret constitutional language concerning aboriginal rights. Although the author does think certain courts should have made different decisions, this doesnβt imply she thinks courts shouldnβt be allowed to decide questions involving aboriginal rights.
5%
e
The language of βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββ
Not supported, because the author describes the language of the constitution as βnecessarily general.β The language had to be written generally.
24%
Difficulty
65% of people who answer get this correct
This is a very difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%139
155
75%172
Analysis
Authorβs perspective
Authorβs perspective
Stems that ask us to find an answer the author is most likely to agree with.
Stems asking us to infer an idea implied by the claims in the passage (as opposed to identifying an idea that appears explicitly). Similar to most strongly supported questions in LR.
Passages that present a particular problem and then discuss the implications of that problem. They also often explore one or more solutions to that problem (although they donβt have to).