Ariel: Conclusion Government art subsidies never benefit art, for art's role is to challenge society's values. █ █████████ ███████ ████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ ███████ ██████ █████████ ███ ████ ███████████ ████ █████ ████ ███████
██████ █ █████ ████ ███ ██████ █████████ █████████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ █ ██████████ ██████████ ████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ █ ██████████ ████████ ██████████ ███ █████████ ██████ ████ ███████ ███ ██ █████ █████████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ██████████ ██████████ ███████
Ariel argues that government art subsidies never benefit art because art's role is to challenge society's values. Ariel believes that since the government expresses society's values, artists who depend on government subsidies cannot challenge the institution that supports them.
Sasha agrees that art should challenge society's values but believes that in a democratic society, a government encourages dissent and challenges to its values.
Disagree: Ariel and Sasha disagree that government subsidies can benefit art.
The dialogue most supports the █████ ████ █████ ███ █████ ████████ ████ ████ █████ █████ ███████
art's role is ██ █████████ █████████ ██████
a society's values ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████
artists can express ██████████ ██████ ██ █ █████████████ ███████
art subsidies provided ██ █ ██████████ ██████████ ███████ ███
only governments that ███████ ███████ ██████ ████ ███ █████████ ███ ██████ ███████████