Wrong flaw. Ethics generally have nothing to do with spelling, so this argument’s premise isn’t very related to its conclusion. That’s not the flaw from the stimulus, though, where a person is deemed unable to judge an error merely because that person has committed or overlooked the same error in the past.

Because a news program has at times discriminated in its hiring and promotion decisions, this argument concludes that the program cannot be trusted to pass judgement on a different entity’s hiring practices. Like the stimulus, this ignores the fact that a person can judge others’ mistakes even if she herself has made or overlooked similar mistakes!

Wrong flaw. Even if selling a product is allowed under one clause, that doesn’t mean the product must be safe or can’t be condemned by an agency. That’s not the flaw from the stimulus, though, where a person is deemed unable to judge an error merely because that person has committed or overlooked the same error in the past.

Wrong flaw. As far as we’re told, accepting a lucrative promotional deal has nothing to do with judging swimming practices, so this argument’s premise isn’t very related to its conclusion. That’s not the flaw from the stimulus, though, where a person is deemed unable to judge an error merely because that person has committed or overlooked the same error in the past.

Wrong flaw. This argument fails to establish that running the feature would alienate high schoolers, and also overlooks the possibility that the magazine might have interests that supersede its revenue. That’s not the flaw from the stimulus, though, where a person is deemed unable to judge an error merely because that person has committed or overlooked the same error in the past.