Pure scienceβresearch with no immediate commercial or technological applicationβis a public good. ββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ β βββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ β βββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββββ
A society that wants the benefits of pure science should use public funds to support research. The research needs lots of funds and does not bring short-term profits. Private corporations will not fund projects without short term profits. Therefore, public funds should be used instead.
This is an alternative course of action that is ruled out in favor of the conclusion. Private corporate funding wonβt work, so we should use public funding instead.
The claim about private corporations ββββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
It expresses the ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
This is not supported by any other part of the argument, so it cannot be the conclusion.
It explains what ββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
This claim does not tell us anything about pure research. The actual definition of what is meant is contained between the em dashes.
It distracts attention ββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββββββββββ β βββββββββ βββ βββββββ βββββ
This does not describe a goal - it is telling us what corporations will not do. Additionally, it supports the point at issue by ruling out an alternative solution.
It supports the ββββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββ βββββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ
This is descriptively accurate. One of the reasons that we should use public funds is because another option, corporate funds, is not accessible.
It illustrates a ββββ βββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ β βββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββ
This is not a case, it is just a rule that the behavior of private corporations follows.