Self-study
Artist: Support Avant-garde artists intend their work to challenge a society's mainstream beliefs and initiate change. ███ ████ ███ ██████████ █████ ████ ██ ███████████ ████ ████ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███████████ ████████ █ █████████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ████ █ █████ ██████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ██ ███████████ ████ ███████ ███████ ██ ██ █ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ███ ███████████ █████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████
Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
Avant-garde work that becomes popular in its own time is not successful, despite what some art collectors believe. Why? When avant-garde work becomes popular, it does not fulfill the intentions of the artist. The intentions of the artists are to challenge mainstream beliefs and initiate change. However, no such change could occur in a short period of time.
Identify Argument Part
The claim of some art collectors is what is being refuted. The art collectors think avant-garde work that becomes popular in its own time is successful, while the artist’s argument says no - that means the art is not successful.
10.
The reference to the claim ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ █████████
a
It serves to ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ███████████
It is in opposition to the main conclusion. The main conclusion refutes it.
b
It identifies a ████ ████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████
The argument is dedicated to refuting/disputing this particular claim.
c
It identifies a ████████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████
This position is given no support within the argument. The initial premise is used to support the opposite conclusion.
d
It provides support ███ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████
The claim provides no support for the other parts of the argument. The first premise stands alone, without any support.
e
It provides support ███ █ ███████████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████
This is a claim that is being refuted, and it doesn’t support anything else. Additionally, the initial premise is just a premise - the opposing arguments diverge on success, not the intentions of artists.