PT124.S3.Q24 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The professor concludes that freedom cannot only be measured by the number of options available to someone, and that the variety available in those options is also a relevant part of freedom. This is based on an example about beverages: someone with many beverage options all of a similar kind is less free than someone with fewer beverage options of more various kinds.

The professor draws a conclusion about a general principle using a specific example. The professor uses one hypothetical case where someone has multiple choices—in this case, of beverages—to show that freedom depends on not just the number of choices, but also on the meaningful differences between those choices.

The professor supports the general principle that freedom depends not just on the number of available choices but also on the variety of those choices, by means of an example about a person choosing from a selection of beverages.

The professor does not make claims about one case from a general principle, but the opposite: the professor draws a conclusion about general principle based on one example case.

The professor does not draw an analogy between cases to support a conclusion. Instead, only one case is used as an example to support the general principle which makes up the professor’s conclusion.

The professor does not make any claims about how qualities of group members relate to qualities of a whole group.

The professor does not infer a general principle from another general principle, but rather infers a general principle from a specific example case.

PrepTest 124 - Section 3 - Question 24

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action