PT125.S2.Q2 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

Some of the people most opposed to animal cruelty are actually contributing to animal cruelty, because they have pets that eat meat.

The author has made a conclusion about people’s actions qualifying as animal cruelty, but we have no idea what constitutes animal cruelty. The only thing we know about the group that’s been accused of cruelty is that they feed their pets meat. So, we need to know that this act contributes to animal cruelty.

It is not necessary that these people love all forms of animal life. We are trying to conclude that these people contribute to animal cruelty, and (A) is irrelevant for that conclusion.

We don’t need these two groups to overlap. We aren’t talking about people that are opposed to keeping dogs and cats as pets, so (B) is irrelevant.

The conclusion is specifically about some of the people most opposed to animal cruelty. It is not necessary for people working in particular places to have some level (we don’t even know how much) of opposition to it.

We’re talking about the ones that are fed meat. Irrelevant.

This needs to be true. If we negate this, then feeding meat does not contribute to cruelty to animals, and the argument falls apart.

PrepTest 125 - Section 2 - Question 2

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action