Support Many of those who are most opposed to cruelty to animals in the laboratory, in the slaughterhouse, or on the farm are people who truly love animals and who keep pets. βββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ
Some of the people most opposed to animal cruelty are actually contributing to animal cruelty, because they have pets that eat meat.
The author has made a conclusion about peopleβs actions qualifying as animal cruelty, but we have no idea what constitutes animal cruelty. The only thing we know about the group thatβs been accused of cruelty is that they feed their pets meat. So, we need to know that this act contributes to animal cruelty.
Which one of the following ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
Loving pets requires ββββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββββ βββββ
It is not necessary that these people love all forms of animal life. We are trying to conclude that these people contribute to animal cruelty, and (A) is irrelevant for that conclusion.
Many of those βββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ
We donβt need these two groups to overlap. We arenβt talking about people that are opposed to keeping dogs and cats as pets, so (B) is irrelevant.
Some people who ββββ ββ βββββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββββββββ ββ ββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ
The conclusion is specifically about some of the people most opposed to animal cruelty. It is not necessary for people working in particular places to have some level (we donβt even know how much) of opposition to it.
Many popular pets βββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββββ
Weβre talking about the ones that are fed meat. Irrelevant.
Feeding meat to ββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ
This needs to be true. If we negate this, then feeding meat does not contribute to cruelty to animals, and the argument falls apart.