PT127.S2.Q9 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

Rifka’s argument

Premise: If we’re not lost, then we don’t need to stop and ask for directions.

Assumption: We’re not lost.

Conclusion: We don’t need to stop and ask for directions.

Craig’s counter-argument

Premise: We are lost.

Conclusion: We do need to stop (and ask for directions, presumably).

Craig contradicts Rifka’s assumption (that they are not lost) in order to land on a contradictory conclusion (that they do need to stop and ask for directions).

Descriptively inaccurate. Craig does offer a reason to reject one Rifka’s implicit premises: they are lost! “Contradict the conclusion of Rifka’s argument” is an accurate description of Craig’s argument.

Descriptively accurate. An assumption is an implicit premise. Craig contradicts Rifka’s assumption (that they are not lost) in order to arrive at a contradictory conclusion (that they do need to stop and ask for directions).

Descriptively inaccurate. Craig reject’s Rikfa’s implicit premise that they are lost. There is no indication that he accepts Rifka’s explicit premise. It’s unclear if he’s implying anything. Rather, he explicitly contradicts Rifka’s conclusion.

Descriptively inaccurate. Craig does not provide a counterexample. Rather, he contradicts Rifka’s presumption that they are not lost.

Descriptively inaccurate. There is no indication that Craig accepts Rifka’s stated premise. Craig explicitly rejects Rifka’s conclusion.

PrepTest 127 - Section 2 - Question 9

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action