Tania: Conclusion A good art critic is not fair in the ordinary sense; Support it is only about things that do not interest one that one can give a truly unbiased opinion. █████ ███ ██ █ ████████ ████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ ████ ████████
████████ ███ ██ ███ ██████ █ ████████ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ████████████ ██████ ████ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ █████ █████████ ████ █████ ████████ ███ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███████████
Tania concludes that a good art critic isn’t fair. This is because an unbiased (fair) critic needs to be uninterested in art, but good art criticism requires emotion (which Tania is implying requires interest in the art).
Monique asserts that the best art critics shed all their biases before delivering their criticism. She acknowledges that art is a passion, but says it’s not only a passion.
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree over whether good art critics can be unbiased. Tania thinks they can’t. Monique thinks that can.
The dialogue most strongly supports ███ █████ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ████████ █████ ███████
art is not ██████ █ ███████
good art criticism ██ █████████ ████████
art critics should ███ ████ ███████ ██████ ████████
fairness generally requires ██████████ ███ █████████ ██ ████
the passionate engagement ██ ███ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ██████ ██ ███ █████████