Mechanisms for recognizing kin are found throughout the plant and animal kingdoms, regardless of an organism's social or mental complexity. ββββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββ
Phenomenon Β·Many plants and animals can recognize "kin" (relatives)
Inclusive fitness hypothesis Β·Organisms transmit genetic material through relatives (not just offspring)
Contrast inclusive fitness with traditional view of evolution. Under traditional view, natural selection favors those with the most offspring. Inclusive fitness suggests natural selection also favors organisms who help their relatives (because this helps spread the organism's own genes).
Example of theory applied to cannibals Β·Spadefood toad tadpoles
Some tadpoles eat their own species. But they nip at other tadpoles before eating, and end up eating only nonsiblings. Suggests they're trying to avoid eating their kin. But, they're more likely to eat kin when they're very hungry.
Example showing other explanation Β·Tiger salamander larva
Some larva are cannibals. The bacteria are more deadly to close relatives, because the relatives have a similar immune system to the infected larva. So, when tiger salamanders avoid eating their close relatives, it could be because they just don't want to die from the bacteria in their relatives. This is about the organism's individual self-interest, not about trying to increase overall genetic representation.
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis (RC)
Single position
13.
The passage states which one ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ
Question Type
Stated
The author mentions βmechanismsβ for kin recognition at the beginning of P1. So the correct answer might find support from that part of the passage. But weβre also told about a mechanism for kin recognition in tadpoles. Perhaps the correct answer could come from that part.
Not supported, because the author doesnβt state anything about what would make the mechanisms easier to explain. Although we know mechanisms for kin recognition exist in organisms of different complexities, we have no idea how those different complexity levels relate to an explanation of the mechanisms.
5%
b
The mechanisms have ββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ
Stated.
50%
c
The mechanisms have ββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ
Although weβre told that inclusive fitness theory was developed in the 1960s, this doesnβt imply that we did not focus on explaining the mechanisms before 1960. Perhaps we turned our attention to the theoretical basis of kin recognition in the 1950s, and inclusive fitness theory came along after several years of that attention.
The author doesnβt state what is required before we can fully explain the mechanisms of kin recognition. You cannot point to any line that states we need to understand the detailed workings of kin recognition mechanisms.
Not stated, because we donβt know that kin recognition can have different mechanisms when the underlying purpose of kin recognition in those species is the same. You cannot point to any line or collection of lines that shows when the purpose of kin recognition is the same, there can be different mechanisms for recognizing kin.
31%
Difficulty
50% of people who answer get this correct
This is a very difficult question.
It is slightly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%156
164
75%173
Analysis
Stated
Stated
Stems asking us to identify an idea that appears explicitly in the passage (as opposed to ideas that are merely implied).
Passages that focus on describing or evaluating potential explanations for a given phenomenon. Causal reasoning features prominently in these passages.