During most of the nineteenth century, many French women continued to be educated according to models long established by custom and religious tradition. ███
███ █████ ██ █████ █████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ███ █████████████ █████████ █████████ ████ █████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ███ ██ ████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ████ ████████████ ███ ████████ ████████ █████ ███████ █████████ ███ █ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ████ ██████ ███████████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ████████ █████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ███ █████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ █████ ███████ ██ ███████ █ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███
████ ███████ ████████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ █ ██████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ███████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ █████████ █████████ ██ ███████████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███
The author would most likely ████████ ███ █████████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
They espoused reforms ████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████
Not supported. If anything, the author suggests the two proposals were quite radical for the standards of the day, which is
They were fundamentally █████████ ███ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ██ █████████
There’s no evidence the author considers the two proposals unethical.
They were well-meaning ████████ ██ ██ ██ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ █████
This is the best supported answer. Both proposals attempted to tap into the egalitarian ideals of the French Revolution and sought a more egalitarian structure of education for men and women. Although they failed to pass, they both represent attempts to implement egalitarian education.
They were reasonable, ███ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ██████████ ███ ████ ███████
The author doesn’t indicate that it’s “difficult to understand why they failed.” In fact, the author
They were not ███████ ███████ █████ ████ ████ ███ █████ ██████████████
Not supported, because the author never suggests the reason they failed was their lack of comprehensive scope. In fact, the second proposal did have a “more comprehensive approach.”