Self-study
Huang: Support Most people who commit violent crimes do not carefully consider whether or how they will be punished for these crimes. ███ █████ ███ █████ ██████ ███████ ██████ ████ ██ ███████████ ██ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ██████ █████ █████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ██████
███████ █████ ███ ███ ███ ████ █████ ██████████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ █████████ █████████ ███ █ ██████ █████████ ██ █████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ █ ██ █████████ ████ █████████ █████████ ███████ ████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ███
Speaker 1 Summary
Huang claims that, to reduce violent crime, we should address the root causes of violence instead of imposing mandatory sentences. As support, Huang explains that most people who commit violent crimes don’t think about the likely punishment. Also, people who don’t commit violent crimes just aren’t inclined to. This indicates that mandatory sentences don’t make much difference.
Speaker 2 Summary
Suarez argues towards an implied conclusion that mandatory sentences are a useful deterrent. To support this, Suarez says that mandatory penalties do deter nonviolent crimes (implying a possible analogous effect for violent crimes). Suarez also claims that mandatory sentences prevent most physical violence from happening.
Objective
We’re looking for a disagreement. Huang and Suarez disagree about whether mandatory sentences deter violent crime.
4.
The dialogue between Huang and ██████ ████ ████████ ████████ ███ █████ ████ ████ ████████ █████ ███████
a
the best way ██ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ████████
Huang says that we should reduce violent crime by addressing the root causes of violence, which could be taken as agreement with this claim. However, Suarez never talks about the merit of addressing the root causes of violence.
b
people who commit ███████ ██████ ███████ █████ ██████████
Neither speaker talks about whether people deserve punishment. Their debate is about the practical effect of mandatory sentences, not the moral aspect of deservingness.
c
people who commit ███████ ██████ █████████ ████████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ ██████
Huang explicitly disagrees with this claim, but Suarez doesn’t give an opinion. Although Suarez thinks that mandatory sentences can deter violent crime, that’s not the same as saying that potential offenders always carefully consider potential punishments.
d
mandatory sentences will █████ ████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████ ██████ ███████ ██████
Huang disagrees with this but Suarez agrees, making this the point of disagreement. Huang’s argument indicates that mandatory sentences don’t have a deterrent effect on violent crime. Suarez, however, directly states a belief that mandatory sentences prevent most violence.
e
severe penalties reduce ███ █████████ ██ ███ ███████
Suarez most likely agrees with this, but Huang never talks about nonviolent crimes such as tax evasion. We don’t know what Huang thinks about the possible deterrent effect of severe penalties in such cases.