In filmmaker Woody Allen's . ██████████████ ██████ ███ ██████ █████ █████ ██ █████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ███ █████████████ █████ ████ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ █████ ██ ██████ ███ ████████████ ███ ██████ ███ ██ ███ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ███
███ █████████ █ ████ ████████ ██ ████████ █████████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ██████ ███████████ █ ████████████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ███ █████ █ █████████ ██ █ ████████████████ ██ ████████ █████████ ████ ██████████ █████ ██████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ██████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██ ████████ █████ ███████ █████████ ███ ███ ██ ███ ██ █████ ███ █████████ ████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ████ █████ █████ █████ ████ █ ████████ ██████████ ████ █ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ████████████████████ ████ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ ████ █████ ██████ ███ ████████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ███
██ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██ █ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██████ █ ███████████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████ █████████ ███ ████ ███████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████████ ███ ████████████ ████████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████ █████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ████ ████████████
██ ██ ████ ███████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ███ ████ ██████ █████ █████████ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ██████ ███ █████████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████ ███ ███ ████████████ ██ █████████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███ ████████████ █████████ ████████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ █████ ██████ █████ ███
The author mentions the title █████████ ██ █████ █████████ ██
counter the prevailing ████████ ████ ██ ███████ █████
The author never mentions the prevailing critical view of Allen’s films. So the author certainly doesn’t counter it.
exemplify a primary █████████████ ██ ███████ █████
The author’s point in mentioning Zelig’s title character is to show that the less artistic characters in Allen’s works are more likely to end up happy. The author never suggests that having less artistic characters end up happy is a “primary preoccupation” of Allen’s works. These characters do appear in his works, but we have no reason to think that the main preoccupation is to show that less artistic character end up happier. Rather, we could say one of Allen’s preoccupations is criticism of artists; but this is different from a preoccupation with showing that less artistic characters are more likely to end up happy.
serve as a ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ █████
This is the best answer. Zelig’s title character, who is less artistic but ends happy, acts as a contrast to the more artistic characters who don’t end up happy.
demonstrate that artistic ██████████ ████ ██████ ████ █████████ ██ ███████ █████
The author’s point in mentioning Zelig isn’t to show that artistic character are important in Allen’s works. It’s to show that the less artistic the characters, the more likely their narrative is to result in a happy ending.
illustrate Allen's obvious █████████ ███ ███ █████████ ██████████ ██ ███████
The author’s point in mentioning Zelig isn’t to show that Allen likes certain nonartistic characters. It’s to show that the less artistic the characters, the more likely their narrative is to result in a happy ending.