New problem and solution ·Properly dividing parallel tasks is hard; solution was to design computer network like tree branches
Tree branches follow very efficient patterns for collecting and moving resources; computer networks that follow the same underlying patterns are very efficient at generating and transmitting data
Emeagwali's perspective ·Nature will become a more important source of inspiration for technical solutions
Passage Style
Single position
Spotlight
13.
It can be inferred from ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██ ███ ███████ █████████ ████████ █████████ ███ ███ ████ ████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ██ ████ ██ ████
Question Type
Implied
To understand why massively parallel computers hadn’t been used to model oil field flow prior to 1989, we should understand Emeagwali’s insight that allowed him to solve the problem of modeling oil field flow. In P2, the author tells us that one of the great difficulties of parallel computing is dividing tasks among smaller computers so that they don’t interfere with each other. How did Emeagwali solve this? By designing a system based on the branching structures of trees.
The author never suggests that supercomputers were sufficient for handling “most” (over half) problems arising from oil production. In addition, supercomputers failed to model oil field flow.
b
the possibility of █████ █ ███████ ██ ███████ █████████ ██ █████ ███████████████ █████████ ████████ ███ ███ ███ ████ ██████████
Not supported, because we don’t know that people were not aware of the “possibility” of using a network of smaller computers to solve difficult problems. We’re told that “one of the great difficulties of parallel computing is dividing up the tasts among the separate smaller computers so that they do not interfere with each other.” This suggests that people already were aware of the possibility of using a network of smaller computers; but the issue was that they hadn’t figured out how to get the computers not to interfere with each other.
c
the general public ███ ███ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ████████████ ██ ███ ████████
The general public’s view isn’t mentioned as a reason parallel computing hadn’t been used to model oil field flows.
Supported by the middle of P2. Emeagwali’s breakthrough involved solving the problem of dividing tasks among smaller computers so that they don’t interfere with each other. This suggests that prior to Emeagwali, this interference problem was a reason parallel computing hadn’t been used to successfully model oil field flows.
Difficulty
52% of people who answer get this correct
This is a very difficult question.
It is significantly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%147
163
75%178
Analysis
Implied
Science
Single position
Spotlight
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
4%
160
b
41%
162
c
2%
159
d
1%
155
e
52%
166
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.