Constance: Conclusion The traditional definition of full employment as a 5 percent unemployment rate is correct, because Support at levels below 5 percent, inflation rises.
████████ ████ ███████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██████████ ███ █████████ ██████ ███ ████ ██ █████████ ███ █████████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ██████ ███ ████████ ███████ █████████ ████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████ ██ █ ██████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ██ ██ ███ ███ █████ █ ███████ ████████████ ██ ███ ████ ███████████
Constance claims that it is correct to define full employment as a 5 percent unemployment rate. Why? Because when unemployment drops below 5 percent, inflation increases.
Brigita argues that 5 percent unemployment is truly full employment. Why not? Because Constance’s definition doesn’t account for modern working conditions. Brigita says that when people are working multiple part-time or temporary jobs, 5 percent unemployment is not full employment. Furthermore, people currently do work in those conditions. Thus, 5 percent unemployment is not actually full employment.
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. Constance and Brigita disagree about whether full employment can be accurately defined as a 5 percent unemployment rate.
The dialogue most strongly supports ███ █████ ████ █████████ ███ ███████ ████████ ████ ████ █████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████
what definition of ████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ █████ ████████████ ████████ ██████████
whether it is █ ████ █████ ███ ██████ ███████████ ██ █████ ███ ████████████ █████ ██ ████ █████ █ ███████
whether a person ████ █ █████████ ███ ██████ █████ ██ █████ ████████
whether the number ██ █████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ███ █████████ █████ ███ ███████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██████████ ███ █████████
whether unemployment levels █████ █ ███████ ███ █████ █████████ ██████ ██ ████