Beck: Our computer program estimates municipal automotive use based on weekly data. ████ █████ ████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ██ █████████ ██ ███ █████████
Beck concludes that the computer program for estimating weekly municipal automotive use is accurate, counter to the questions of some staff. This is supported by the claim that the program’s figures are consistent every week.
Beck uses information about consistency to draw a conclusion about accuracy, which presumes that consistency guarantees accuracy. This overlooks the possibility that, for example, the program could be inaccurate by the same amount every time, making it consistent but still inaccurate.
The reasoning in Beck's argument ██ ██████ ██ ████ ██
fails to establish ████ ███████████ ██ █ ████ █████████ █████████████ ████ ████████
fails to consider ███ █████████ ████████ ██ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███ ███████
takes for granted ████ ███ █████████ ██████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ██████████
regards accuracy as ███ ████ █████████ ███ ███████ ███ █████████ █████
fails to consider ████ ███ ███████ █████ ███████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██████