A famous artist once claimed that all great art imitates nature. ██ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ███████ ███████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███ ███████ █████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ████ █████ █████ ████████ ███████ ██ ████
The argument discusses a famous artist's claim that all great art imitates nature. However, the author points out that most great music does not imitate anything, such as ocean waves or animal sounds. Because of this, the argument concludes that either:
The artist’s claim is incorrect, or most great music is not actually great art since it doesn’t imitate nature.
The artist’s claim is incorrect, or most great music is not actually great art since it doesn’t imitate nature.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ █████████
Music is inferior ██ ███ █████ █████
Either the artist's █████ ██ ██████████ ██ ████ █████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ████
Like some great ██████ ████ █████ ████████ ███ █████████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ███████
Some elements of ██████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ██ █████ ████
Sounds that do ███ ███████ ██████ ███ ███ █████ ██████