University president: Support We will be forced to reduce spending next year if we do not increase our enrollment. βββ ββ ββ βββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ
The president concludes that the university needs more aggressive marketing to maintain its quality of education. She uses two premises to support this:
1. If enrollment doesnβt increase, the university will have to reduce spending. By the contrapositive, if the university doesnβt reduce spending, its enrollment will need to increase.
2. If the university doesnβt market more aggressively, its enrollment wonβt increase. By the contrapositive, if the university increases enrollment, it must have marketed more aggressively.
The idea of maintaining quality is in the conclusion, but it isnβt in the premises! So the answer choice will need to link βmaintain qualityβ with the premises in one of the following ways:
1. To maintain quality, the university must not reduce spending; or, by the contrapositive, reduced spending would result in a difference in quality
2. To maintain quality, the university must increase enrollment; or, by the contrapositive, if enrollment doesnβt increase, quality will not be maintained.
The conclusion of the university βββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
The university will βββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ
The university will βββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ
The university will ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββββ
The university will βββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββ
The university will βββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββββ
