Most writings on the subject of motion pictures, including those scrutinizing the structural characteristics, aesthetic qualities, and effects of motion pictures on audiences, have traditionally been relatively abstract and have not considered what a film's audiences actually see. ██ █████ ███████ ████████ ███████ █████████ ███████ ███ ███████████ ██████ ███ ███ ██████████ ███████████ █████ ████████ ███ █████████ ██ █ ████ ████ █████████████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███
██ ███ ███████ ██ █████████████ █ ████ ███ ██ █████████ ██ ████ █████ ███
████ █ ████ ██ █████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ █████████ █████████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ █ ████ ██ █████ ████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ███████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██ █████ █████ █████ ██████████ ███████ ██████████████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ███████████ ███ ███████████████ ██ █████████████ ██ ███████ ███████████████ ███ ███████ ████████████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ █████████████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██ ██ ██████████████ ████ ████████████ ████ ██ █ ██████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████ ██ █ █████████ █████ ██ ██████ ████ ██████████ █████ ███ ██████ █████████████ ███ ███████████ ███████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ █ █████
██ █████ ████ █████████ ███ ████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ███████ ████████ ████ ████████████████ ██████ █████ █████ ███ ███
In the passage, the author █████████ ████████ ██
provide evidence against █ █████ ████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ █ ██████████ ███ ████
No, it’s to provide evidence for a claim that is often overlooked in the criticism of a particular art form
establish that changing ███ █████████ ████ ██ █ ██████████ ███ ████ █████ ███████ ██████ ████████████ ██ ████ ███ ████
Two issues with this answer choice. First, the passage never talked about the “materials” (e.g., film or digital) used in movies. Second, the passage was trying to make the opposite claim: modifications of the movie degrade public appreciation.
refute a commonly ████ ████ █████████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ██ █████████ ██ █ ██████████ ███ ████
There was no claim that criticism of movies has a detrimental effect. (The passage did argue that modifications of movies have detrimental effects.) So the passage could not possibly have attempted to refute this non-existent view.
describe a problem ████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ █ ██████████ ███ ████
Correct, the problem is that reproductions of films are often compromised, misleading both critics and audiences.
explain why a ██████████ ███ ████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ █████████
While this might be the purpose of a portion of P4, it is not the main purpose of the entire passage. The author does not take the position that movies as an art form overall is the target of negative criticism. The author does say in P4 that